RE: H-9 Jackal 50
Hi Harry, Hands down I love the 50 size Sundowner the most. My first one was running a .95ax but it way to heavy, but it certainly was quick. It was fitted the same way as the Dubb Jett 60LXH and I used one of their tuned pipes. A .75ax will fit no problem but a little work will be needed. My latest Sundowner runs the Dubb Jett 60LXH, lite super fast and reliable. http://www.jettengineering.com/sundowner.html
Posted on: 8/7/2012 3:44 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11184756

RE: H-9 Jackal 50
Hi Mark, the OS .75 will not fit, they recommend you use a Evolution .52NX or .60NX small base engine in this plane. A pity it would be a weapon with a .75.
Posted on: 8/6/2012 3:30 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11183315

RE: ****????
Well its does state 4.8v to 6v for RT-88 retract servo, other versions NES 513, 713 & 791 says to use 4.8V. I have only ever used Hitec retract servos in the past, the 4.8v always turned me off JR versions. But why is the RT-88 dying all the time, are you over driving it in either direction? Can you adjust the end points on the RT-88, on the Hitec servo you cant, but Spektrum version you can. http://www.horizonhobby.com/products/rt88-retract-servo-JSP20080#t2
Posted on: 7/12/2012 6:43 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11153252

RE: ****????
I beleive JR retract servo's can only take 4.8 volts, any more will cause it to crap itself. Better off getting a good metal gear ball bearing servo and use that so can adjust the end points.
Posted on: 7/11/2012 3:43 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11151797

RE: which servo tester to get......
Have had 2 of the "Turnigy" servo centerers/testers and they are useless. I replaced the first because i thought it was a bad one, it wasnt they are all bad. Basically plug in servo and center it, contect push rod, then when you go to bind RX all servo's arent centered? Its okay to test but dont use it to center.
Posted on: 6/25/2012 3:27 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11131608

Help to find 22.2v 6S 5000mah 35c li-pos
I'm trying to find reasonably priced 22.2v 6s 5000mah 35c li-pos. They will be powering a 72" F-9 Panther EDF, on the below website they are $170.00 each, which i think is a little expensive. Any help would be appreciated: http://www.extremerc.com.au/estore/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=146_11_195_252&products_id=933&zenid=2a32035ef1b7cf31ac0742d8bca35b0c http://www.extremerc.com.au/estore/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=90_94_96&products_id=611 Thanks Herbs
Posted on: 6/21/2012 3:56 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "Batteries & Chargers"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11127048

RE: Dx8 still has problems
The problem occured about 3.5 to 4 years ago. At my club we had 5 x DX7's replaced, one had his replaced twice.. Lemons happen, but it can certainly give the manufacturer a bad name.
Posted on: 6/13/2012 3:49 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11117221

RE: Dx8 still has problems
I believe what tncrosby is saying, its obviously the transmitter. Of course using 4v RX batteries isnt a good idea but people are using them and having no problems even with Spektrum. Its clear that the TX is not sending a full strength signal all of the time which forces the RX to go off air and then the plane crashes. In Australia we received a large batch of Spektrum DX7's, this same senario as above was happening. All the TX's including mine were replaced, and of course no reason was forth comming from the Aussie importer. Basically he has a lemon DX8 and needs to have it replaced, I personally would have had it replaced at crash 3 but thats me.
Posted on: 6/13/2012 3:38 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11117208

New ARF from Phoenix - OMG!!!
http://www.phoenixmodel.com/Default.aspx?mode=view_detail&CatId=74&id=335
Posted on: 5/23/2012 6:37 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11092379

RE: Cleaning Solutions
Some guys at the my club use Glycol, and swear by it. But you have to soak the donk in it for 24 hours though.
Posted on: 5/12/2012 2:38 AM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "The Clubhouse"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11077758

RE: 1/4SCALE SPITFIRE SORTIE
Accomplished by a club In Victoria Australia, Western Port Model Aircraft Club or WPMAC, i'm not sure if the record still stands. April 1994 was the highlight of our Clubs activities, when a small contingent of members took 3 identical model aircraft all the way to West. Australia, and flew one of the models back to the South Australian border, in one flight without landing for fuel, and achieving a new WORLD RECORD for single flight long distance of 493 kms. The successful pilot was PETER GARONI.
Posted on: 5/6/2012 2:20 AM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11070063

RE: Black Horse Macchi C.200
[quote]ORIGINAL: miklos Well, here's a pet peeve of mine.... Why are so many manufacturers putting out these kits that are just shy of 80'' wingspan? It can't be that hard to add another couple of inches and make it IMAA legal so we can fly it at the giant scale warbird meets. That's about the only thing that keeps me from looking seriously at some of the BH kits. [/quote] BH have these warbirds, do they qualify as IMAA legal? http://www.blackhorsemodel.com.vn/index.php?mod=pro&act=detail&pid=248 http://www.blackhorsemodel.com.vn/index.php?mod=pro&act=detail&pid=247 http://www.blackhorsemodel.com.vn/index.php?mod=pro&act=detail&pid=232 & almost forgot http://www.blackhorsemodel.com.vn/index.php?mod=pro&act=detail&pid=158 Herbs
Posted on: 5/5/2012 3:48 AM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11069131

RE: Dawn Patrol over Gilman Springs WW1 2012 (lots of cool pics)
Its an Albatross D1 or D111 or DVA
Posted on: 4/26/2012 7:14 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11058427

RE: Anybody converted futaba 8fg to use other diy module like frsky?
[quote]ORIGINAL: jcervantes11 Ewwww. No thanks. I want to take advantage of ACCST technology. FrSKY ACCST technology is proven, approved by many model associations, tested and reviewed as the leading Chinese 2.4Ghz R/C Technology. If you think DSM2 or FASST is the best, think again! New FrSKY ACCST (Advanced Continuous Channel Shifting Technology) gives you secure radio communicatios in 2.4Ghz band. ACCST 2.4GHz system shifts 80 channels around hundred times per second in the 2.4GHz band. This means that the system is completely resistant to interference in that band. Features: Advanced Continuous Channel Shifting Technology (ACCST is our advanced tecnology it shifts channel hundred times per second and there is no signal conflicts and interruptions) robust frequency agility. Easy to bind and very fast link-up. Excellent reboot time. True Diversity with two antennas. All channels can be programmed with Failsafe, quickly and easily. Quick and extremely stable in performance. Precise and smooth servo response. [/quote] Thats a pretty interesting comment! FrSKY if I'm not mistaken cloned Futaba FASST technology in the first place which is channel hopping, which means their ACCST technology is just FrSKYS copy/version of FASST channel hopping technology.
Posted on: 4/19/2012 5:23 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11049115

RE: Wanted Hurricane ARF 90/120 size not fibreglass
Thanks for the info Vik, i'm looking for a Mk.II
Posted on: 4/14/2012 5:34 AM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11041339

Wanted Hurricane ARF 90/120 size not fibreglass
Hi guys, Im trying to find a ARF RAF Hurricane size .90 to .120 Battle Of Britain version that is made of ply and balsa. Black Horse have a 50cc version which is to big, VQ are to small and have the wrong versions and ESM 26cc one is fibreglass. Also I dont want to use petrol but am willing to go up to .220 4 stroke if a kit is out there somewhere. Thanks Herbs
Posted on: 4/12/2012 9:46 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11039828

RE: Futaba RX confusion
[quote]ORIGINAL: fmw [quote]ORIGINAL: mach2 you can get a new 617 Rx on ebay for 69.95 shipped. I may have gone with a JR or spektrum had I known more. Futaba is expensive and limited. all those plug and play parkzone planes aren't compatible with futaba. Id like to try some of those little foamies some time, so ill have to use an expensive futaba Rx. Some guys use those hobbyking orange receivers. I personally wouldn't risk an expensive plane to save 50 bucks though. Maybe on one of those foamies.... <a target=''_blank'' href=''http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/__14300__OrangeRx_Futaba_FASST_Compatible_8Ch_2_4Ghz_Receiver.html''>www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/__14300__OrangeRx_Futaba_FASST_Compatible_8Ch_2_4Ghz_Receiver.html [/quote] I'm using the FRSky receivers now.  They are a clone of the R617 Futaba receiver but with nicer fit and finish and a slightly smaller case.  $24 each at Hobby King.  The Futaba receiver isn't any better. [/quote] Say what, a cloned copy made in China is just as good as a Futaba original? Yes I would put one in my $1000.00 plane and save $45.00 ummm i dont think so. Infact all the HK rubbish receivers should be banned by each countries governing body, they are illegal copies, using them encourages it more.
Posted on: 3/22/2012 9:34 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=11011470

New Spektrum 18 Channel
http://www.spektrumrc.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdId=SPM18000
Posted on: 3/7/2012 1:37 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10990395

RE: New Seagull A6M Zero
Hi Andy, regarding the decals by mate owns a vinal cutting machine, and he was nice enough to do me some new ones. With regard to the lustrekote, i made sure the surfice was clean, applied decals and then sprayed, just make sure its not to cold or to hot when applying. Your engine choices are fine, but you cant beat the sound of a four stroke in a warbird. Herbs
Posted on: 2/26/2012 5:46 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10977347

RE: New Seagull A6M Zero
This is how it looks on the box and when completed...Plenty of room for improvement.
Posted on: 2/19/2012 11:45 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10966454

RE: New Seagull A6M Zero
Its a pity you havent seen it, Seagull have released a lot of new birds in the last year. Its a beautiful flyer the Zero, and doesnt have any bad habits, the takeoffs are so to scale.. http://www.seagullmodels.com/News.asp?m=1
Posted on: 2/19/2012 6:30 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10966702

RE: Hangar 9 NEW DUE March P-40 B !!!!!!
Its beautiful and one of my favourite versions of the P40, but a 50 size, ummm why isnt it 60 size like their other warbirds? Wonder if they will do a 150 version like the P51 and P47?
Posted on: 2/19/2012 5:19 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10966574

RE: New Seagull A6M Zero
I used a product call Lustre Coat, I got it at my local hobby shop. No surface prep is required except make sure the surface is clean, and then just spray it on. Its also fuel resistant, but after applying have to be careful ironing the covering, need to put a cloth between iron and covering or it will burn.
Posted on: 2/19/2012 1:57 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10966316

RE: New Seagull A6M Zero
Here are some pics of mine. Its not very scale out of the box, throw away the decals, spinner and the pilot. And then start from there, also the covereing is to glossy, so a matt clear finish was applied. Mine is powered by a Saito 125a, witha 3 blade prop and a Tru turn spinner.
Posted on: 2/19/2012 1:30 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10966264

RE: 8FG Super Impossible
Wetting your finger before using the scroll also helps, it just doesnt like a dry finger.
Posted on: 2/11/2012 2:01 AM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10953772

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
And we have a winner! Congrats rgburrill I'm looking for an airplane: 1. It has one engine and entered service with the RAF in late 1942 2. Although based on one of the best USA fighters of WW2, this aircraft was designed for different duties. 3. This version kept the original engine, later versions changed powerplants 4. The USAAF & RAF expected this aircraft to operate below 12000 feet while on a mission 5. This version was fitted with dive brakes and bomb racks The first A-36A (42-83663) was rolled out of the NAA Inglewood plant in September 1942, rapidly going through flight testing with the first flight in October, with deliveries commencing soon after of the first production machines emerged. The A-36A continued the use of nose-mounted .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns along with wing armament of four .50 in (12.7 mm) caliber machine guns. The USAAF envisaged that the dive bomber would operate mainly at altitudes below 12,000 ft (3,658 m) and specified the use of a sea level-rated Allison V-1710-87, driving a 10 ft 9 in (3.28 m)-diameter three bladed Curtiss-Electric propeller and delivering 1,325 hp (988 kW) at 3,000 ft (914 m).[10] The main air scoop inlet was redesigned to become a fixed unit with a larger opening, replacing the earlier scoop which could be lowered into the airstream. In addition the A-36 carburetor air intake was later fitted with a tropical air filter to stop sand and grit being ingested into the engine.[6][11] The USAAF later ordered 310 P-51As which were essentially A-36s without the dive-brakes and nose mounted weapons, leaving an armament of four wing-mounted 0.50 in (12.7 mm) Browning machine guns.[12] An Allison V-1710-81 1,200 hp (895 kW) was fitted and used the same radiator and air intake as the A-36A. The P-51A was still fitted with bomb racks although it was not intended to be used primarily as a fighter-bomber and the racks were mainly used to carry drop tanks.[12][13]
Posted on: 2/9/2012 1:02 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10951635

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
I'm looking for an airplane: 1. It has one engine and entered service with the RAF in late 1942 2. Although based on one of the best USA fighters of WW2, this aircraft was designed for different duties. 3. This version kept the original engine, later versions changed powerplants 4. The USAAF & RAF expected this aircraft to operate below 12000 feet while on a mission 5. This version was fitted with dive brakes and bomb racks
Posted on: 2/9/2012 3:24 AM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10950978

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
I'm looking for an airplane: 1. It has one engine and entered service with the RAF in late 1942 2. Although based on one of the best USA fighters of WW2, this aircraft was designed for different duties. 3. This version kept the original engine, later versions changed powerplants 4. The USAAF & RAF expected this aircraft to operate below 12000 feet while on a mission
Posted on: 2/9/2012 2:13 AM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10950939

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
I'm looking for an airplane: 1. It has one engine and entered service with the RAF in late 1942 2. Although based on one of the best USA fighters of WW2, this aircraft was designed for different duties. 3. This version kept the original engine, later versions changed powerplants
Posted on: 2/9/2012 1:23 AM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10950925

RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
[quote]ORIGINAL: Herbs_007 I'm looking for an airplane: 1. It has one engine and entered service with the RAF in late 1942. [/quote] 2. Although based on one of the best USA fighters of WW2, this aircraft was designed for different duties.
Posted on: 2/8/2012 7:42 PM by Author "Herbs_007" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10950652