|
RE: District 3 pattern champs Oct 11-12
Well done Mike...great contest! Thanks to Mike, Melissa, Gary, Dean and everyone else who put in all the work so we could come up and have fun. Thanks also to RVP for use of his "weekend manor"...nice to be landed gentry isn't it Ron? I hope the unknown open FAI round is the start of a new tradition...I'm still laughing over that one. -Ryan
Posted on: 10/13/2008 8:51 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=8046389
RE: SUPRA~FLY 45 UNLIMITED RESURRECTION
I have a "5 flight old" Supra Fly .45...if anyone is interested, let me know. M_S_Mcl@yahoo.com Ryan McLaughlin
Posted on: 6/29/2008 10:16 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "Classic RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=7676115
RE: new pattern plane era50????
I just returned from flying the ERA prototype and would like to pass on a few observations for those interested. Setup: Futaba 6EX 2.4 Servos 3151 sport digitals on surfaces, 3115 throttle OS .55 AX w/ stock muffler 6-ounce tank 15 % Cool Power 12 x 6 APC Sport Prop 4 ¾ lbs, no spinner or wheel pants Flying: Flew all current AMA/FAI pattern sequences up to and including FAI “F�. The plane handled each with no problem and seems to be matched well to this power plant. This plane resembles my 2-meter Integral in its general characteristics and, in fact, handles rolling circles, rolling loops as well or better. The speed of the airplane is manageable but it does require more aggressiveness on throttle—throttle up sooner, throttle down later than larger pattern planes. Experiments with the CG proved that it will snap with elevator alone if you go too tail heavy but it is quite directionally stable when the CG is more reasonable [8D] . This plane is most suited to pattern, not 3 D. Notes: - Did not “float�, it needs to be flown all the way down on landing, but it will come to a near stop before touchdown - Possessed a slight tendency to pitch to the belly in knife edge - Required a bit of left wing tip weight to track straight in loops - Pulled to the canopy slightly in up and down lines - CG was most satisfactory with no tail or nose weight but with full sized rudder servo in rear - Is not pushed around by crosswinds, but as expected it will “bounce� a bit more than the large planes in turbulence - Completed one full Masters or P sequence followed by one F sequence on a tank Conclusion: This airplane is ideally suited for practice and I will acquire one to use as my primary pattern ship between contests and as a legitimate backup during them. It is economical, easy to transport and as simple as a trainer in setup. The radio we used here had no mixing capability and no dual rates were used. We intend to address the above noted issues by changing the design slightly in hope that mixing will not be required and to be floatier. As we have yet to fly in gale force winds, I cannot speak to it’s rough weather capabilities, but I will not be afraid to test it when the time comes. This is not the plane for the 3D enthusiast, but will no doubt work well as an electric. Please feel free to post any questions you have and I will try to answer them. The plane will be available at the Jacksonville, FL contest for anyone who wants to take it for a spin. Thank you, Ryan McLaughlin
Posted on: 9/13/2007 8:02 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=6364524
RE: Balsa Usa Moonraker
I actually had one of these around 1985 or so. I learned to fly sportsman pattern with it. I actually had never seen one before and haven't seen or heard of one since...until now. It looked and flew pretty much like a kaos. My only real recollection was that someone taught me to do slips on landing by doing a split "S" over the end of the runway and holding cross controls to slow it down. It did this beautifully. I think I have a picture of it somewhere and will try to post it if I can find it. Good luck, I think you'll enjoy it! Ryan McLaughlin
Posted on: 2/14/2007 9:16 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "Classic RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5420330
RE: Aurora 60 Build Thread - Electric Power
Congratulations! The Aurora was my favorite plane of all time. "Back in the day", I built the MK kit which was clearly the best kit I have ever seen. I had a lot of fun with it and I'm sure you will too. Consider the BPA...excellent candidate. I still have the MK nosegear I used in that plane in 1989. It is the only airplane related thing I saved during my 15 year absence from flying! Funny the things we save...I probably will not use it again so if you are interested in it shoot me an email. I used Supras for the mains and I have recently acquired a set of those too. Let me know and good luck! I look forward to following your progress. Ryan McLaughlin
Posted on: 11/11/2006 12:43 AM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "Classic RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4981617
RE: Starting the BPA
Checkmate Mistress Dalotel Beetle Cosmos Citation Runaround Saturn (Grotto2!)
Posted on: 10/19/2006 1:08 AM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "Classic RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4886827
RE: Starting the BPA
Steve, Thank you for the invite. We hope to compete in SPA when your season begins again even if it means flying our current F3A airplanes. I have practiced the Novice sequence and am ready. As to the subject of this thread, I see nothing to beware of. As the originator suggested, BPA may become nothing more than a cyberspace club. Does it really matter if it makes people happy? I just returned to pattern last year after a 15 year break having left off with BPA style planes. I guess I never got over them. This is all about fun and games. I competed in FAI last year with a 13 year old Desire held together with packing tape. It was loaned to me by a good friend and fellow competitor who did not want to see me left out. Pattern is not an exclusionary pastime in my experience, yet some have been advised recently to form their own association. I believe the contributors to this thread have taken the suggestion to heart and truly want this to succeed. It may or may not, but at least no one can say that you and others did not try. The conversation itself has merit. I hope that the BPA thread is allowed to remain in the Classic Pattern Forum, an area which appeals to many of us who participated in an earlier era of this sport. Ryan McLaughlin
Posted on: 10/18/2006 12:21 AM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "Classic RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4882363
RE: "T" Canalizer - Mole or Beauty Spot?
That's ok...I sent it to Mike Hester to make me a pretty one, although he doesn't know it's coming yet [8D] Too bad the silly thing works....
Posted on: 10/17/2006 11:06 AM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4879100
RE: Starting the BPA
I think BPA has crossed the threshold into "moral imperative". If I recall, non-turnaround pattern was flown in all AMA classes well into the late 80s. Perhaps we use the rules and patterns flown then and see what happens? To Gary C's point, maybe we restrict the size to keep things in check and/or allow any plane that was flown up to when AMA made the change. We should all be able to find something between 0 A.D. and 1989 A.D. that will serve the "spirit of the law"...fast and smooth. Let's all show up at Gary's contest using his guidelines and take a vote there on permanent rules.
Posted on: 10/14/2006 10:38 AM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "Classic RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4866491
RE: Starting the BPA
Perfect.
Posted on: 10/11/2006 6:28 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "Classic RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4855615
RE: Black Magic v2 builder's thread! *Updated*
LOL... No doubt it's ugly. Mine is particularly hideous as bare balsa and fiberglass. I was really hoping it wouldn't do anything but... I might just pull it out for the "F" sequences anyway. It's not needed anywhere else. Maybe retractable??? Hmm...Mike?
Posted on: 10/2/2006 2:00 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4818634
RE: Black Magic v2 builder's thread! *Updated*
I finally had an opportunity to take some measurements on my Black Magic last night. After several weeks of trimming and experimenting, I believe that I have it exactly where I want it. Here are the basics... Black Magic v2 #1: Radio--Futaba 9Z, 9151s aileron, 9351 elevator (deps) and rudder, 3102 throttle, 1400 mah Nicd Power--OS 160, Perry Pump (1/2 turns in from factory setting), Mueller wrap around header, Hatori (??) pipe, Hyde Aria mount, Central Hobbies pipe mounting system, APC 18.1x10, Tru Turn spinner Weight--10 lbs 5 oz CG--Leading edge of wing tube Incidence--1 degree positive on wing Thrust--exactly what Mike had (looks like about 2-3 degrees right, 1-2 down) Aileron throw--1 inch up, 1 1/8 inches down Elevator throw--7/8 inch up and down Rudder throw--2 1/4 inches left and right (or as much as you can get) Things to know: -Engine mounted at slight angle to accomodate header--no holes in side -Baffle at air inlet to direct air to head -Pan isolated from fuse at rear to avoid rattle -Plane is sensitive to vertical CG--mount battery low in fuse -Elevator trim changes with temp--two servos in tail would solve this and save nearly two ounces of lead ballast to offset OS 160 -Slow speed performance is dependent on correct incidence and CG -Some elevator and aileron mixing is required for knife edge -Plane seems to fly more solidly at 10 1/4 lbs than at 9 1/2 as originally delivered Likes: Plane rolls on a rail and draws a great line Snapping performance is excellent Knife edge requires almost no rudder input Spin breaks are distinct (use only slight amount of aileron for spin) Will climb vertical farther than you can see it Wood/foam construction is light and durable Dislikes: Rudder is weak in certain attitudes, (ie, Rolling "S", rolling circle and rolling 1/2 loop in the FAI "F" pattern) yet very sensitive in normal flight--prone to "skidding" Plane can be hard to see (could be color scheme in this case) Carbon canopy will deform easier than you would expect Belly pan is too flexible As of yesterday, the rudder problem I mentioned above has been solved. After trying various rudder modifications, we found that the only cure was the CPLR "T" wing thingy. We taped a make shift one behind the canopy on a whim and could not believe it when it actually made a difference. With this, the rolling circle and rolling "S" are 100% easier...the plane really carves with rudder input. No other flight characterstics seemed to change. Who knew??? Overall the Black Magic is competitive in any class and fun to fly. I think that this is an economical alternative that would easily see one through from Sportsman to FAI. I have flown through all of the current and 2007 sequences with it and am currently competing with it in District 3 FAI. I'm having a ball with it. Hope this helps...I'll answer any other questions you may have. Thanks! Ryan McLaughlin
Posted on: 10/2/2006 11:43 AM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4818123
RE: What plane to buy after 7 years out of hobby...
Ben-- I have a Sig Kadet with a new airtronics RD 8000 and ThunderTigre .46 which helped me get back into the hobby after a 15 year layoff--also to start career and family. I fly pattern and even used this to practice Sportsman with! I no longer need it or the flight box setup that goes with it so if this appeals to you, shoot me an email. Welcome back and good luck! Ryan_McLaughlin@ml.com
Posted on: 9/27/2006 5:58 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "Beginners"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4800230
RE: Black Magic v2 builder's thread! *Updated*
YS motors are fantastic in many ways. They just have more moving parts, cost a bit more to operate and are not really necessary in this application. At an easily achievable 10lb weight, there is not a maneuver the OS 160 cannot pull this plane through. Thanks to Jon Lowe who helped me learn the correct care and feeding on these, I've really enjoyed the simplicity of the two stroke. That said, Mike is having lot's of fun with his YS in my BM's twin and Emory S. is doing quite well with his electric setup. I have personally flown this plane with an OS 140, Mintor 170 and the OS 160 (I've been busy [8D]). The OS 140 is a bit weak even though the weight was 9.5 lbs. The Mintor maintained this weight and was more than enough power, but it was a Mintor and it created a whole learning curve of it's own. The OS 160 works best and at around 10-10 1/4lbs, I think it flies better than at 9 1/2, especially in rough weather. I think the YS is comparable in weight so this would hold true with that motor as well.
Posted on: 9/27/2006 5:02 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4800001
RE: Black Magic v2 builder's thread! *Updated*
I will post some stats from my plane in the next few days... Mike and I were too busy at the Jax contest this weekend to actually take the measurements. All the adjustments I have made have been at the field "by feel" so I don't have anything specific to post just yet. I can say that the Black Magic is one of the best all around pattern planes I have owned. It is clearly the best rolling airplane I have personally ever flown and it's ability to track on a line reminds me of some of the 80's and early 90's designs I used to fly. The OS 160 is a great match for it for those like me who are concerned about economy. Congratulations to Mike on a great design! I will follow up soon with details on the setup that has worked well for me.
Posted on: 9/26/2006 11:05 PM by Author "McLaughlinRP"
in the forum "RC Pattern Flying"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=4797378
| 
