RE: HeliArtist MD500D or E
I understand that. Once I am proficient with the 400, I will have the fuse all ready. I can get it now; I just wanted to make sure it would fit. Speaking of the 400, I wish I would have got one sooner. It is so much easier to fly than the CP- no where near as twitchy. In the last couple of days I have picked up what it took me months to do with the Blade CP. Thanks for all's answers.
Posted on: 12/23/2008 11:33 AM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "Scale RC Helicopters"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=8274575

RE: HeliArtist MD500D or E
Thanks for your answer. i have been reading the build thread on this fuse over at helifreak, and it sure looks good.
Posted on: 12/22/2008 3:15 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "Scale RC Helicopters"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=8271584

HeliArtist MD500D or E
Hi All, I have been messing aound with Blade CPs for a couple of years now. I wwent to the LHS to get some parts and there was a Blade 400 on consignment. It came with an extra battery pack, canopy, and a whole bunch of parts. Anyway, i walked out of the store with it and a Spectrum DX6i along with all the parts for $260. I have always wanted a Hughes 500 fuselage, so I have been looking around the net. Found HeliArtist and a couple of others but they all say for 450 size helis. Will this fuse work with my new heli? Any answers would be greatly appreciated. So far the best deal I have found on it is at Helidirect ($119 with light set). Thanks, Andy
Posted on: 12/22/2008 1:59 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "Scale RC Helicopters"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=8271347

RE: Seeking Engine Recommendation for H9 US 40
I have an Evolution 46 w/ PITTS on mine and it screams. No additional weight needed, and it flies a long time.
Posted on: 3/11/2007 3:11 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5545185

RE: New ARF - Martin Mauler
The Air Museum here in Oregon at Tillamook has a Mauler. The thing is HUGE. [sm=what_smile.gif]I believe it is the only one left.
Posted on: 2/22/2007 6:32 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5459382

RE: DeHavilland Mosquito
Found some struts that are pretty much good for a Mosquito. I have the ARF, just haven't startedbuilding it yet. Anyway, here they are. They are for a DH88 Comet, and I think they will take 4 inch tires. http://www.hobbypeople.net/gallery/190230.asp
Posted on: 1/16/2007 4:36 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "Twin & Multi Engine RC Aircraft"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5275030

RE: Mosquito Retract Help..
I have the same ARF, but I am not at that stage yet. If you go to Advanced Scale Models, the struts they have listed for a Dehavilland Comet will work very nice for a Mosquito. The Dh Comet was actually the "precursor" to the Mosquito anyway. I looked at the DC3 gear; one of the problems with it is that it wouldn't be capable of very large tires, and they wouldn't retract all the way into the nacelles. I believe you can put 4 inch tires on the Comet struts, and that would be about right, scale speaking. the other nice thing- they are only 30 dollars, then you could buy normal Robart or SpringAir or whatever, drill them out if needed, and attach these. http://www.hobbypeople.net/gallery/190230.asp My .02, FWIW. Andy From Wikipedia Despite previous British air racing successes, culminating in 1931 in the outright win of the Schneider Trophy, there was no British plane capable of putting up a challenge over the MacPherson course with its long overland stages. The de Havilland company stepped into the breach by offering to produce a limited run of 200 mph (320 km/h) racers if three were ordered by February, 1934. The sale price of £5,000 each would by no means cover the development costs. In 1935, de Havilland suggested a high-speed bomber version of the DH.88 to the RAF, but the suggestion was rejected. (De Havilland later developed the de Havilland Mosquito along similar lines as the DH.88 for the high-speed bomber role.)
Posted on: 1/16/2007 3:49 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5274816

RE: Twin Mustang kit or ARF
http://www.rcuniverse.com/magazine/article_display.cfm?article_id=545 They did it electric, but you are looking for World Models, and they call it a P-82. I've seen the kit (good one), and if you look in the Twins and Multi section of this forum, you will find it there as well. Andy
Posted on: 1/12/2007 1:32 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5253847

RE: Military Carl Goldberg R/C plane and radio
The set-up was called an ARCMAT. Augmented Radio Control Miniature Aerial Target. They came 3 plane/ 1 engine to a box. I have one of the HB 61s, and it is still running strong. FQM-117A To provide a more realistic training environment, RS Systems introduced the ARCMAT (Augmented RCMAT) in 1981. Conversion of an FQM-117A to ARCMAT standard involved the replacement of the target's nose crutch by a three-dimensional nose section and the addition of a two-dimensional fuselage and tail section. These sections were designed to represent the MiG-27 and MiG-21 (and A-7, F-16 for recognition training), and resulted in usable 1/9th scale representations of said aircraft. Many thousand FQM-117As were converted to this standard. In the mid-1980s, RS Systems introduced still more realistic fully three-dimensional scale targets representing various Soviet and American aircraft. The U.S. Army procured the 1/9th scale MiG-27 Flogger-D model as the FQM-117B. The FQM-117B had a slightly more powerful engine than the simpler FQM-117A, and had also the additonal AIRMILES payload option. AIRMILES was a system from RS Systems compatible with the Army's MILES, and featured a target-installed programmable THI (Tactical Hit Indicator). The THI gave "flash-bang-smoke" feedback whenever the target was "hit" in a definable area for a definable number of times. AIRMILES could be programmed with different "lethalities" for different types of surface-to-air weapons, and could use a low-energy (eye-safe) "fire-back" laser for "cover and concealment" training. This "fire-back" laser, which was mounted on the back of the FQM-117B, was operated manually by the target operator. The FQM-117C was a 1/9th scale model of the F-16 Fighting Falcon, and was used together with the FQM-117B in exercises involving friend/foe recognition training. More than 100000 FQM-117 targets of all versions were delivered to the U.S. Army, but the 1/9th scale RCMAT has been phased out in the late 1990s.
Posted on: 1/7/2007 6:56 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "Golden Age, Vintage & Antique RC"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5227474

RE: TUSKEGEE AIRMEN FILM
I'm pretty sure Lucaas wouldn't need to hire anyone to keep from screwing that up. Kind of like in Pearl Harbor, when the Dauntless dive bombers attack Battleship Row. Good point, I forgot about that part. All said though, I am pretty sure that is the only movie that has ever been made about them.
Posted on: 1/3/2007 3:48 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5203777

RE: TUSKEGEE AIRMEN FILM
Yes, there was. It was on HBO if I remember correctly. It also had that kid that played Bill Cosby's son in it, Malcolm Jamal something. Not too bad of a flick, and you have to love any movie that has Warbirds in it, especially that many.
Posted on: 1/3/2007 3:33 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5203700

RE: World Models P-39 Airacobra Question
Put a three bladed prop on it for ground clearance? Would look good. I saw the same model here at the LHS. Looked pretty good, but a .91 4 stroke might be too big. You could always go with the line that you don't have to open it all the way up[8|]
Posted on: 12/30/2006 1:50 AM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5181529

RE: FW 190 @DUXFORD
Speaking of replica Ki-43s, I know that the Tillamook Air museum here in Oregon has one. From what their info sheet on it said, it was pieced together from 5 wrecks, and they are running a DC3/C47 engine in it. Looks pretty nice. The gear on it really looks spindly. Reminds me of a colt, all legs and not much body. Pretty cool though. It has what are called "butterfly" flaps on it. Very different.
Posted on: 12/30/2006 1:45 AM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5181512

RE: FW 190 @DUXFORD
It is definitly one you don't see everyday at the field. Neither is the Typhoon, for that matter.
Posted on: 12/29/2006 3:50 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5178918

RE: O.S. FF-320 Peguses Starter Information
http://www.hobby-lobby.com/fema.htm Is this it? it's made by Fema, i think.
Posted on: 12/29/2006 3:32 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "Questions and Answers"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5178846

RE: FW 190 @DUXFORD
It's definetly a FlugenVerk machine http://www.flugwerk.de/diary.shtm Pictures all the way down at the bottom.
Posted on: 12/29/2006 2:40 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5178615

RE: FW 190 @DUXFORD
http://www.preservedaxisaircraft.com/Luftwaffe/fockewulf/fw190.htm I have seen the Dora in Seattle- very pretty plane, even with the long beak.
Posted on: 12/29/2006 2:29 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5178578

RE: Engine /carb height vs fule tank
I have the other problem in my Rare Bear. The tank sits a good 1.5 to 2 inches below the carb. Would a Hopper tank set-up work? I used to use them in RC boats, escpecially hydro-planes.
Posted on: 12/29/2006 1:46 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5178407

RE: FW 190 @DUXFORD
I can't rememebr now if IL2 shows the swastika on German planes or not. I know that flight sim was designed in Russia (I think). Every other marking on the planes is in there. Gotta love IL2, PAC Fighters, FB and ACEP.
Posted on: 12/29/2006 1:38 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5178372

RE: FW 190 @DUXFORD
[quote]Missing the historically correct tail swastika though.[/quote] Thank you CPT Obvious. [8|]It's probably missing the Luftwaffe pilot that "should" be in it as well. Probably not carrying any cannons either. The very fact that an FW-190 is taxiing around and is coming over here is much more important than whether or not it has a Swastika on it. IIRC, planes in Germany (full scale or model) are not allowed to have that symbol painted on them - period, at all, nothing, no way. If this was indeed refurbished in Germany, that would explain it. Keerist, it could be in Bondo and Primer and it still would be awesome. Not trying to be jerk here, but we need to be appreciative of the historical event, not pick it apart. From the looks of the other markings, they got it as right as German law will allow. I think it rocks. My .02, for what it is worth.
Posted on: 12/29/2006 1:28 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5178335

RE: Hold it, I have a question.
Thanks, I'll look into it. I really don't want to spend a bunch of time on the Mosquito and crash it in under 30 seconds.[:D]
Posted on: 12/21/2006 1:47 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5144086

RE: Hold it, I have a question.
The pictures of the $199 bird are identical to CMPs website. Also, JET hobbies in Canada lists the same pictures and plane along with all of the other CMP products. I bought my Mosquito from them. 29 dollars to ship to La Grande. They aren't listing a price today, but it is usually the same ($199). Looking around, I don't see any other FW190 ARFs, unless I am missing something. Do you know of any? I moved over here from Eastern Oregon about 3 months ago; haven't found a place to fly yet. I did get to go to the Evergreen Aviation Museum and see the Spruce Goose. They have a RC strip behind the museum. That plane is unbelievable. They also have a G model Me-109 there that is in great shape. Not sure if it flys, or just static display. Most of their warbirds are in flying status. Definetly a must see collection.
Posted on: 12/21/2006 1:34 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5144013

RE: Hold it, I have a question.
Thanks for your quick reply. Woa Richard, I never thought I would hear you say "Genuine CMP". That just strikes me as funny, all things considered. I knew for sure that one was a CMP, because the "photo shoot" they did on it is identical to my Mosquito. That's a pretty good kit; it will need new hardware, and there a fixes to make, but it will be my first twin. I need to find another twin to pratice on, not really sure where to start. (Twinstar?) I really like your websight; you have a great bunch of planes. Did the high winds affect you last week? I have a friend near Fort Lewis and he was without power for a couple of day. We just had severe winds here in Portland. Take care and thanks again. Andy
Posted on: 12/21/2006 12:58 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5143891

Hold it, I have a question.
If you follow the link at the top of this page (NitroPlanes, I think) they show two different FW190s. One is $199, one is on sale for $169. Looking at the pictures, one has panel lines, but they both have flaps, they both are about the same size (one is 70, one is 71 inch WS). What's the deal? Andy
Posted on: 12/21/2006 12:00 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5143675

RE: spruce goose...
I was wondering the same thing, because I just went and seen it last Sunday. The rudder is as big as a B-17s wing. The flaps are bigger than most airplanes wings. It is something you just have to see to experience it. On another note, there are two models of it there as well that they used in the movie. One of them is a 12 foot wingspan running electric motors. If you are still interested, I can contact the museum for you. The problem with taking pictures of it is it doesn't fit in any camera I have[:D] Andy PM me if I can help. I live about 20 minutes from her.
Posted on: 12/12/2006 7:57 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "Scratch Building, Aircraft Design, 3D/CAD"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5108518

RE: ThunderTiger Rare Bear
Thanks for the advice. I was thinking I should clean the inside of it first with alcohol, in case there is any mold release agent still in there. Thanks again.
Posted on: 12/9/2006 12:42 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5094303

RE: Thunder Tiger - September Fury 1/7th
Get ready to get beat with the Thunder Tiger/ Ace Hobbies stick. A little bit of a sore subject in some threads, due to the outstanding ARF of the Rare Bear. I have one, and it has it's flaws. With that being said, many people here have worked around it. I read a review of this kit in one of the magazines, and they liked it, but, how long has it been since you have seen a bad review of any plane in any magazine? Since it has the retracts and spinner included (I think), if you like to rebuild stuff, go for it. All ARFs need work. I think ARF means Almost Ready to Fix. Read the threads on the Thunder Tiger Rare Bear and their Navy version of the Bearcat before you buy this, as a piece of advice. Andy[:D]
Posted on: 12/8/2006 11:19 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5092824

RE: ThunderTiger Rare Bear
Okay, finally started on this kit. I have the revised tail from ACE. I am going to put a TT 1.20 in it, with the stock spinner and a Bisson Pitts. I have never used 3 bladed props, so what would be a good prop to start with? I still don't know if I will use mechanical or air for the retracts, but everything else is coming together pretty good. What did everyone use to glue the fuselage former and tail parts in? I have heard that ZAP A DAP II would work. Will it, or should I use epoxy, or Gorilla Glue, or what? I have never used fiberglass cloth, but I was thinking this might be a good time to start. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Andy
Posted on: 12/8/2006 11:08 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "ARF or RTF"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5092788

RE: Mosquito?
Not sure about a kit. The ARF I am talking about comes form several people, but it's all the same ARF. GSP, Nitroplanes, Raidentech, Flair are all the same plane. As far as plans, I am pretty sure Brian Taylor has plans for the Mossie. Look at RC Scale Builder.com; there are a couple of people on there that have built Mosquitoes.
Posted on: 12/2/2006 12:03 PM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5066023

RE: Mosquito?
As far as an ARF, about the only one I know of is GSP. I have it, and it is a pretty good kit. It will have it's challenges, but what ARF doesn't? There is a thread on it in the Twins section called DeHaviland Mosquito with some great information in it.
Posted on: 12/2/2006 11:31 AM by Author "cat5752" in the forum "RC Warbirds and Warplanes"
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=5065917